Dealing with Angry Parents! Free Essays

We often feel that parents are scolding us or angry with us for things that we feel were not so bad as to warrant such a reaction. While this is not very comforting for us, we must know that parents don’t want to do this either. It’s just that sometimes when life is a little hard on their end, they expect support from their kids — no matter how young they might be. We will write a custom essay sample on Dealing with Angry Parents! or any similar topic only for you Order Now When they don’t find this support, they tend to get upset. If you are one of those young people who often see their parents angry, then you must learn how to deal with parents and adults who are not in the best of spirits. Learning the proper way to deal with parents who are upset either at us or because of something else is crucial — regardless of the reason behind their anger. However, doing so is not completely impossible and here are some simple techniques that can help you out. Find out the reason Study the behavior of your parents. Try to notice what makes them unhappy and identify the things that annoy them the most or trigger their anger. The first and most important step is, knowing what makes your parents angry. You will never be able to help yourself or improve the situation without knowing so. Once you find out the reason you can move on to the next step and avoid the nagging or doing something that makes them angrier. Avoid the reasons If you parents get mad at you for not completing your homework on time, try to avoid delaying your work. Similarly, if they get mad at you for not eating healthy food, try to add healthy food to your diet. Whatever the reason may be, you must know that parents always know better. They have far more experience than us and they certainly don’t want us to do the wrong things or do things the wrong way. If they are telling you to do something or to stay away from someone or something, there must be a valid reason for that. Just try to avoid situations that are going to trigger their anger. It might be hard but it’s going to benefit you eventually. Speak to them If you can’t identify what makes them angry, speak to them. Ask them where you are wrong and tell them that you want to make an effort to rectify. Also tell them how their anger has negative effects on you. Don’t have this talk when they are angry because they might not be in a state to listen to you properly, but do it after things cool down a little, perhaps an hour or two after the incident or maybe even a day later. You can also bring up the topic randomly according to their mood. Letting them know that their anger disturbs you and you are ready to comply with their instructions, will help immensely. Consult others If you think they’re not ready to understand or it’s not possible to talk to them you might want to consult a third person. If you can’t talk to your parents, you must find someone to talk to about it. You cannot keep it inside. If you do, the situation will get even worse. And with so many people around it is never too difficult to find someone to talk to. If you have older siblings, consult them and ask how they dealt with the situation in their younger years. If you’re close to friends, share their experiences. However, you must know that not all friends are positive with the problems of other people; some might even take advantage of you and lure you into doing bad things. You must be wise and sensible while consulting a third person. And also be mindful of the fact that if you talk to someone who likes to gossip, he or she might just spread stories about your parents and family which will put them in a bad light. So choose the person wisely. Teachers and school counselors are great pillars of help and support. They are also wise people so their advice will always help you and guide you to find a solution of the problem. Moreover, teachers are generally trustworthy and you cannot discuss such matters with anyone who is not reliable. Hence the easiest bet is to talk it out with your teacher and ask him or her for suggestions to improve the situation. Another safe bet can be your grandparents. They will never exploit the situation because they love you and your parents both. You can brief your grandparents about the situation and ask them to help and suggest you what to do. They might also be able to have a word with your parents and tell them about your feelings and emotions, which you’re not able to convey yourself. Techniques to help you out As mentioned earlier avoiding things and situations that trigger anger will help greatly but at times there are so many other small techniques to make your parents feel happier and less stressed. Try to become responsible, be more obedient, complete your work on appropriate time, take meals properly, apologise even if you think you were right, move to a quiet location, avoid confrontation and arguments and maintain discipline in the house. While all of these put together might seem like a heavy doze, you must know that once incorporated into your lifestyle, all these are very small positive changes that will help you deal with angry parents and also nurture your personality as you grow up. Our parents do so much for us; they literally work day in and day out just so we can get the best of education and a comfortable life. They compromise on their social life to give more time to us. They pick and drop us from school even in the scorching heat of summers without complaining once. They get up before us in the morning and go to bed after we sleep at night, yet don’t complain once. And while doing all this, they might get tired and stressed — after all they are humans and not robots. Hence, we need to understand them and give them the special attention and care they deserve. How to cite Dealing with Angry Parents!, Papers

Sociology - family diversity free essay sample

Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess sociological explanations of the nature and extent of family diversity today. Family diversity means that there are many different types of family in society today not just nuclear, cereal packet families. There are several different types of family within UK society. These include; nuclear, single parent, gay or lesbian, extended and reconstituted. Although nuclear remains the most common family type in the UK today with 20% of families falling into the category, other types are fast on the increase due to societies changing attitudes towards what is considered ‘acceptable’. Perspectives such as functionalist and the new right have been described as ‘modernist’. That is, they see modern society as having a fairly fixed, clear-cut and predictable structure. They see one ‘best’ family type- the nuclear family- as slotting into this structure and helping it by performing certain essential functions. Modernists are firmly opposed to family diversity. We will write a custom essay sample on Sociology family diversity or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page They hold the view that there is only one correct or normal family type. They see the traditional patriarchal nuclear family consisting of a married couple and their dependent children, with a clear labour division between the breadwinner husband and the home maker wife as correct. They also see a clear distinction between who should carry out the ‘instrumental’ and ‘expressive’ role in the household. For example, according to Talcott Parsons there is a ‘functional fit’ between the nuclear family and modern society. He sees the nuclear family as uniquely suited to meeting the needs of modern society for a geographically and socially mobile workforce, and as performing two ‘irreducible functions’- the primary socialisation of children and the stabilisation of adult personalities. He claims these functions contribute to the overall stability and effectiveness of society. Hence, other family types can be considered as abnormal, or even deviant, since they are less able to perform the functions required of the family. However, other sociologists reject the modernist idea that there is one ‘best’ family type or that he family’s structure shapes its members behaviour. Feminist and postmodernist views would argue that modernist approaches ignore significant facts. They argue, as individual social actors, we make our own choices about family life and relationships, and we now have much greater choice about our personal relationships, and that has increased family diversity so much that we can no longer talk about a dominant type. There are many things in modern society that have lead to an increase in family diversity today. One of the main reasons for diversity is the divorce act introduced in 1969-71 meaning women can get a divorce if they feel it is necessary. Judith Stacey argues that greater choice has benefitted women and enabled them to free themselves from patriarchal oppression and to shape their family arrangements to suit their needs. The act has lead to an increase in single parent families and singletons. The modernists would see this as having a negative effect on society as single parent families are ill equipped to bring up a well rounded individual who can make a positive contribution to society. However, a postmodernist, Fiona Weir, argues â€Å"the vast majority of children growing up in single-parent families do so healthily and happily†. Another piece of legislation that is helped increase family diversity is the civil partnerships act (2004). It has meant that same sex couples can legally get married and in many cases adopt a child. Teenage pregnancy is on the increase and this has again increase family diversity and has meant there is an increase in single parent families and the three generational family all living under the same roof. This contradicts parsons claims that the extended family is not as important or needed as much as it was in preindustrial times and points out that in some cases it is needed as much as ever. The changing position of women in society has also had a large impact on family diversity. Many women now are going out to work, whereas in the past they would have stayed at home and looked after the children and her husband. It has meant that many are now either not having children at all or waiting until they are older so they can focus on their careers. The new right and the functionalists would have a big problem with this as they see it as a women’s main job is to bear children, take care of her children and the household. The feminists and postmodernists would however see the changing stature of women as something that is very positive as it empowers them and gives them a choice on what they want to do with their own lives. Another key factor to point out when talking about family diversity would be the role of the media in the betrayal of modern families. In soap operas for example there may be a lot of teenage pregnancies and families such as reconstituted ones. This would have a major impact on what people think is acceptable in today’s society, and if people think it is acceptable they are more likely to do it. The media may have cause subjects such as divorce, which would have been a taboo subject in the past, to become socially acceptable which inevitably lead to an increase in the amount that take place. One of the main issues when talking about family diversity would be the increase in the neo-conventional family. Chester defines the neo-conventional family as a dual earner family in which both spouses go out and work. This family type would be relevant to today’s family because of the recession. The recession has meant that the woman can no longer afford to stay at home and care for her family as it is unaffordable. It is similar to the symmetrical family described by Young and Willmott. For Chester, the extent and importance of family diversity described by the new right has been exaggerated. Like the functionalists, Chester sees the nuclear family as dominant. The only important difference between his view and that of functionalists is that Chester sees a change from a conventional to neo-conventional nuclear family where both play an ‘instrumental’ or breadwinner role. Ulrich Beck argues that we now live in a ‘risk society’ where tradition has less influence and people have more choice. As a result we are more aware of risks. Today’s risk society contrasts with an earlier time when roles were more fixed and people had much less choice in how they lived their lives. The modernists would see this traditional view on society as correct and the way our lives should be lived out today as it is the only way a functioning society can survive. For example, people were expected to marry. Once married, men were expected to play the role of the breadwinner and disciplinarian and to make important financial decisions, while women took responsibility for the housework and childcare. However, the traditional, patriarchal family has been undermined by two trends; greater gender equality and greater individualism. These trends have lead to a new type of family; Ulrich Beck calls it the ‘negotiated family’. Negotiated families do not conform to the traditional norms, but vary according to the wishes of their members. These types of families are increasingly prevalent today mainly because of the recession and also many women want to work.

Importance of Letters in Pride & Prejudice-Samples for Students

Questions: 1.Discuss the Function and Importance of letters inPride and Prejudice. 2.DoesPride and Prejudicereinforce or erode sexist stereotypes of women? 3.Time and space are small inPride and Prejudice. Discuss the significance of critic Dorothy Van Ghents comment on the novels setting. Answers: Introduction Pride and Prejudice is a novel written by Jane Austen in 1813, and it is considered one of her most preferred novels. It is a humorous story of life and love among English gentility. Mr Bennet is an English man living in Hertfordshire with his wife. He has five daughters, Jane Bennet being the eldest one. Unfortunately, after their fathers death, their distant cousin whom they have never met will be inheriting the house. Now, the familys happiness is dependent on the marriage of his five daughters. A rich person Mr Bingley, arrived at their neighbourhood and many tribulations and trials stand between them and their happiness. In the novel, letters are a dramatic device that is used for character revelation, to further the plot and theme exposition. It acted as a mode of communication that helped to convey important information allowing Austen to respond quickly. It is a significant feature as letters were the typical source of communication during the 19th century (Weldon). This epis tolary style was depicted in the novel. It can be stated that letters were used to reveal the characters for the method of introduction and advancement of the novel plot. Therefore, the following discussion involves the highlighting of the function and importance of letters in the novel. 1.Discussion Austen highlighted the function of letters and the way it helped to make connections between the events, personalities and different viewpoints. The immense importance of letters in the novel is indicated by different actions in the plot. The special significance of the novel gives the readers a chance for story narration. The author is not directly narrating the novel plot (Austen-Leigh). Moreover, the main function of the novel is to reveal the contemporary society in the 19th century where letters were important for the communication process. They are also a mean of showing sorrow and happiness and are a way of shaping the characters in the novel. The letters depicted many aspects of people in the novel where they were judgmental before they have known the person. The function of letters was to narrate the novel through letters by one or more characters. Letters served as an advantage as it presented intimate view of the characters and without any interference from the author that helped to shape the events with dramatic immediacy. Letters are defined as epistolary where Austen used them as a function to reveal the characters in the novel of Pride and Prejudice (Gillie). 2.Unravelling of plot The characters speak the story and therefore provide small viewpoints of the happenings. There is only portraying of the characters point of view and not of the author. In total, seven letters helped in unravelling the plot. Mr Collins wrote the first letter announcing his arrival that anticipated his role in the novel. Later, he wrote letters describing how Mr Bennet should behave with Lydia and Darcy engaged to Elizabeth where the author used letters as a plot device. Elizabeth's letter to Mrs Gardiner, her aunt, helped in the revelation of the characters and their relationship in the novel. Darcy also wrote a letter to Elizabeth explaining his past dealings with Wickham. The author avoided dialogue while using letters that helped in providing an important piece of information to the readers. Therefore, this letter-writing event reveals that it played an important role in the furthering of the plot (Murphy). 3.Revelation of character The letters were also used for the revealing characters true image in the novel. It was seen in the two letters written by Mr Collins addressed to Mr Bennet. The reference of Lady Catherine De Bourgh on a constant basis showed his status and pomposity. Consequently, the readers get a picture of Mr Collins social climbing character before he was introduced in the novel (Macpherson). Mr Collins second letter was an apology towards the end of the plot to Mr Bennet. The letter was written when Mr Bennet lost his daughter, Lydia. He also said that it would have been better if she had died instead of eloping for marriage. This act forms a picture that he is a person with high morale and comprises an important theme of pride in the plot. His letters illustrated perfect examples of condescension and pride caricatured through the letters (Srb). Jane letters also helped in furthering the plot as she tells her story about staying in London. Letters helped in revealing her character in the novel and relationship she has with her sisters. The author beautifully condensed Janes stay in London in a succinct manner in the letter (Murphy). The most important letter is from Darcy to Elizabeth. He conveyed his feelings strongly which expresses the theme of prejudice where Elizabeth judged Darcy in a wrong manner. There are other important letters written by Jane to Mr and Mrs Gardiner, her aunt and uncle informing Elizabeth about Lydias elopement with Wickham. Conclusion The above letters in Pride and Prejudice contributed to the narration of the novel. It highlights the time when letters were the main means of communication. The letters provided a chance for narration by the readers instead of the author. The main function of the novel is to reveal the contemporary society in the 19th century where letters were important for the communication process. Letters illustrated drama of expectations that was followed by action being the crucial contributions in the novel. Letters were used to depict the various aspects of the people in the novel. The concept of letters exhibited the two separate audiences in one plot. The reader became the narrator in the plot, as the author is not directly involved in narrating the plot. The author used letters to define the events in the novel and revelation of characters while furthering the plot (Ross and Webb). References Austen-Leigh, Mary Augusta.Personal Aspects of Jane Austen. Cambridge University Press, 2013. Gillie, Christopher.A Preface to Jane Austen: Revised Edition. Routledge, 2014. Murphy, Olivia. "Jane Austens Excellent Walker: Pride, Prejudice, and Pedestrianism."Eighteenth-Century Fiction26.1 (2013): 121-142. Murphy, Olivia.Jane Austen the Reader: The Artist as Critic. Springer, 2013. Ross, Josephine, and Henrietta Webb.Jane Austen's Guide to Good Manners: Compliments, Charades and Horrible Blunders. AC Black, 2012. Srb, Marie N.Irony and Idyll: Jane Austens Pride and Prejudice and Mansfield Park on Screen. Vol. 203. Rodopi, 2014. Van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon.In search of Jane Austen: The language of the letters. Oxford University Press, 2014. Weldon, Fay.Letters to Alice: On First Reading Jane Austen. Open Road Media, 2013.

Argumentative Essay Example Should High School Be Mandatory

Argumentative Essay Example Should High School Be Mandatory High school students are facing the whole new world of education. Is it worth getting? When you’re in high school, it’s challenging enough to plan for the next week, let alone the next 10, 15, 25 years. But if a high school student had the foresight to look ahead that far in the future, and even further down the road, they would undoubtedly see the importance of having a high school education. Rather than leaving it up to the near-sighted adolescent to decide, a law should be enacted mandating that all American residents and citizens complete a high school education. After all, it’s free to the public (or paid for with taxes) kindergarten to the 12th grade. And it’s probable that most people who drop out before graduating from high school tend to lead lives of struggle, financial hardship, and criminal troubles, too. HIGH SCHOOL YEARS ARE THE MOST MEMORABLE ONES To begin with, a high school diploma should be the standard in America, because a solid high school education lays a solid foundation for the rest of a person’s life. In high school, as well as the years leading up to high school, a student learns the basics, of course – reading, writing, and arithmetic – but also how to do many other skills that will serve them well as working adults. The school prepares a person to be a responsible, resourceful adult. In school, whether a student realizes it at the time, they are developing quite valuable skills and learning important information. When a person finishes high school, they can do just about anything an adult person needs to do to survive and live a good life – read road maps and plan a trip; understand contracts and agreements, as well as read directions on how to assemble something; balance a checkbook, research how to solve a problem. A high school education is imperative for everyone looking to survive adulthood. Ultimately life is disease, death and oblivion. Its still better than high school. Dan Savage Secondly, a high school education provides a person with the knowledge and fundamental skills needed to get a job as an adult; therefore, it should be made mandatory. To survive in America as an adult, one needs a decent-paying job – and to get a job that pays even the minimum wage, a person generally needs a high school diploma. Take, for example, a gas-station attendant. They work with money most of the day, so they must have a strong foundation in math – a skill taught in school from the very beginning, up until the more-advanced math courses in high school, such as algebra and statistics. Even gas-station attendants are generally required to have some basic knowledge of technology to work the money machines. Nowadays, students begin working on computers from a very early age, in elementary school, and they’re taught more advanced computing skills in high school. Also, attendants each day must communicate information to customers and supervisors alike. Communi cation skills are created and developed through one’s schooling, through writing papers, engaging in discussions, reading, researching and conversing. Without a high school education, a person lacks the necessary skills to be successful as an adult. Thirdly,  a high school education should be mandatory for all Americans for another important reason: the entire point of education is to establish the intellectual foundations needed to be self-educated. In other words, when a person graduates from high school, they possess the intellectual and  informational resourcefulness one needs to teach him or herself just about anything. Naturally, there are tons of people with just a high school education who have gone on to become very successful individuals in just about various fields and industries. Due to their educational foundation, however, they are self-learners capable of mastering any task and challenge they face as adults. FRATERNITY VIOLENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION To conclude, there should be a law that makes a high school education mandatory for all Americans; that is, a person should be penalized for not finishing high school and getting their diploma. A lack of education hinders an individual, which hurts the economy in the long run – which in turn hinders a country from moving forward and flourishing. It gets left behind. One may go as far to argue how Americans should be legally required to have some sort of post-high school education – whether a college degree or at the very least some sort of specialty education, an apprenticeship, if one prefers the less-academic route. Either way, a high school education is necessary for anyone required to work for a living. It’s imperative for success.

Godfather essays

Godfather essays Francis Ford Coppolas, award winning film, The Godfather portrays a mafia family trying to survive among a crumbling empire of crime. The Godfather is more then just a movie about dog-eat-dog. With the use of great camera shots, dialogue, acting, character development, and storyline Coppola was able to create a classic masterpiece. The agreement of criminality and family honor is achieved with perfect accuracy. The Godfather portrays themes such as power, violence, love and betrayal. Through these various themes Coppola creates a purpose, which allows the audience to identify with the Corleone family. The Godfather is for certain entertaining, but entertainment is not Coppolas main purpose in creating this film. Coppola displays a strong emphasis on family and family values. The Godfather is a story about a family and the importance of staying together. In the past traditional American families were stereotyped from television shows such as Leave it to Beaver and The Brady Bunch. These families hold the stay at home mom who cooks and cleans for her working husband and the children who may get into trouble, but seem all too perfect. As America continues to get older the stereotypical family seems harder to believe. The Godfather displays a family that some may view as dysfunctional, but through the plot one understands they hold true family values. For instance, the Don never wanted his son Michael in the family business but instead wanted him to have a respectable job. Through displaying a different natured family Coppola is able to create the image that family worth is not based on how perfect the family seems. The Corleone family is involved in a business of crime. However, Coppola balances the story between family life and the ugly business in which they are engaged. No matter how ugly or sinful the business gets the love and respect this family has within their h ...

Universal Preschool Thesis Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Universal Preschool - Thesis Example According to Brotherson (2005), â€Å"A 3-year-old toddler's brain is twice as active as an adult's brain.† However, given today’s scenario of every increasing cost of living it is very difficult for parents to stay at home all the time to take care of their young children. Additionally, most parents cannot afford to send them to a good day care/preschoolwhere the child would be taken care of not just in terms of their basic need of being fed and kept clean, but also their psychological development needs. A ‘Universal Preschool’ is a program which addresses both the concerns. Both about the financial aspects and quality of care provided. HISTORY Universal preschool is a program spanning across international geographies. It is said to have started in France in 1834. However, in the US the Head Start program which started in 1965 as a summer school marked the beginning of universal preschool. Many states now have their own universal preschool programs which may differ in structure, but cater to the same needs. For example, Georgia’s universal preschool program which began in 1995 serves all 4 year olds and is a voluntary program. Similarly, Florida started in 2005 with a voluntary program serving 4 year old children (LeMire, 2009). Oth er states which are running such a program: Illinois, New Jersey, Oklahoma and West Virginia. States which are currently doing ground work to implement universal preschool program: Vermont, Wisconsin, Maryland, New York, Maine, Louisiana, and New Mexico (LeMire, 2009). RISKS The most common arguments given against universal preschools are: huge cost to the state, no long-term impact, negative behavioral and lack of substantial difference in child’s development and cognitive ability.All of these in turn raise questions on efficiency of tax-dollars spent. Out of these, the one associated with behavior problems is more important and something that needs more serious consideration. According to Hanson (2007), Dr. David Scott in 1989 said addressing an international psychiatric conference in Eastern Europe: â€Å"Institutionalized children... suffered developmental retardation and deprivation. In comparison with children raised in families, the institutionalized children suffered heightened emotional disorders, fear, tension, behavioral disorders, and even such physical symptoms as weight loss and more frequent respiratory infections.† These were the findings for a 20 year period after WWII when 90% of Czech children were sent to state run preschools. (p. 1) BENEFITS Universal preschoolsadhere to better health and safety standards than most substitutes. Another important benefit of the program is the separation of policy for infants/toddlers and preschoolers (Bushouse, 2009). It prepares children for better performance in kinder garden and later on in schools. Universal preschools also help the non-English speaking children. For example, when non-English speaking start kinder garden, they often lack comprehension just because they do not know the language well enough. There is a very high probability that the school then puts them through special language programs, which can be frustrating and create extra burden for the child. A universal preschool w ould help such children by developing English language skills early on. An increase in the number of working mothers has resulted in a large number of preschoolers being in some kind of non-parental care. For example, in the state of

Chinas Speedy Development in the Past Three Decades Essay

Chinas Speedy Development in the Past Three Decades - Essay Example Domestic policies have seen China’s economic development rise and continue to grow, even as other large world economies experience negative or stagnant growth. These policies opened up China to foreign trade and investment leading to a fast-growing economy in the recent decades; moreover, the domestic policies supported industrialization and structural change stimulates growth. They aim at developing strong and sustained investments that are driven at the very low levels, thus empowering the poor and uplifting their financial status (United Nations, 2012 p. 39). Effective management and proper implementation of the laid down policy frameworks have lead achievement of substantial strides in the developing China’s economy. The formulation of domestic policies established reforms in various sectors of the economy such as agriculture, industry, trade and foreign investment, which has also seen economic growth and human development. Reforms in the agricultural sector alleviated extreme poverty and food shortages; food prices also fell as the agricultural income was on the rise. In the industrial sector, there was large-scale privatization of enterprises owned previously owned by the local government. This encouraged growth of the private sector, and increased their output and increased the revenue to the economy. Initially, China’s economy centrally controlled, vastly inefficient and isolated from the global economy but with reforms to policies on trade and foreign investments, the economy improved to achieve a steady growth rate each year (Sahoo et al, 2010 p. 3).